Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate machine-readable implementation of dataset metadata #120

Open
RalfG opened this issue Sep 26, 2022 Discussed in #9 · 0 comments
Open

Investigate machine-readable implementation of dataset metadata #120

RalfG opened this issue Sep 26, 2022 Discussed in #9 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request framework Related to the Quarto and/or GitHub Actions framework

Comments

@RalfG
Copy link
Member

RalfG commented Sep 26, 2022

Discussed in #9

Originally posted by jspaezp September 13, 2022
[...]
Finally, what do you think about making the attributes section a TOML/YAML, it would still render well in the viewer but it would make it a lot more machine parsable.
[...]


Originally posted by RalfG September 26, 2022
[...]
I agree, machine-readability would definitly be a plus. However, to facilitate contributions from the community, we would like to keep the setup of the source markdown files as uncomplicated as possible. Finding a good balance between those two aspects will require some thinking and investigation into the possibilities within the Quarto framework.
[...]

@RalfG RalfG added enhancement New feature or request website Related to the development of the website itself framework Related to the Quarto and/or GitHub Actions framework and removed website Related to the development of the website itself labels Sep 26, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request framework Related to the Quarto and/or GitHub Actions framework
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant