Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The question about query frame objective(3.5) #2

Closed
Hzj199 opened this issue Dec 3, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

The question about query frame objective(3.5) #2

Hzj199 opened this issue Dec 3, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@Hzj199
Copy link

Hzj199 commented Dec 3, 2020

Hi, thanks for sharing this nice work!
I have a question about Lq loss. Why can query frame objective encapsulate constraints that mentioned in paper 3.5 by minimizing the Lq loss?

@PruneTruong
Copy link
Owner

Hi, in the query loss, through learning the kernel operator R_theta (from the SGD-based
minimization of the final network training loss, not during optimization), we basically learn the objective which we want to impose on the correspondence volume between the filter map w and the query feature map. Particularly, this loss enables to impose smoothness priors on the correlation output by for instance learning differential operator. This is similar to traditional unsupervised optical flow, which usually relies on a smoothness loss, according to which the gradient of the flow field should be minimized. Here, if R_theta learns differential operators, finding w which minimizes the query objective basically results in finding w for which the gradients of the resulting correspondence volume are minimized. Hope that helps !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants