Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

process ecosystem services values #92

Open
emillipede opened this issue Apr 28, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

process ecosystem services values #92

emillipede opened this issue Apr 28, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@emillipede
Copy link
Contributor

emillipede commented Apr 28, 2020

AS A/AN:
user

WHEN I:
view an individual tree (and the urban forest as a whole)

I WANT TO:
see data that document what ecological benefits the tree (and whole forest - maybe on the landing page) offer

USDA Forest Service calculations make some ecosystem services values possible to estimate (by species and tree size) with iTree, a Windows software program:

  • Pollution removal and human health impacts
  • Carbon sequestration and storage
  • Hydrology effects (avoided run-off, interception, transpiration)
  • Building energy effects
  • Tree bio-emissions
  • Avian habitat suitability
  • Ultraviolet radiation (UV) tree effects

The calculations are also documented in this PDF.

https://github.com/OpenTreeMap/otm-ecoservice offers another way to access these calculations. what do you think is the best way to go about it? if we use this repository, computing these values may require supplementing this csv, which only includes 23 species https://github.com/OpenTreeMap/otm-ecoservice/blob/develop/data/output__SoCalCSMA__species_codes.csv

let's add these values to the existing tree json files? in a future back end, we could also calculate ecological benefits based on a user's specific view, for example, all of the trees visible on the map or in a specific neighborhood (but that's not on option right now)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants