-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Verification functions #27
Comments
I propose a more user-friendly interface: verify(solution, instance, type=‘cvrp’) # verify CVRP solution
verify(solution, instance, type=‘vrptw’) # verify VRPTW solution It’s not as explicit as the one I proposed before. But it’s way easier to use. We should allow the first argument to be a file path or an actual solution object, and idem for the second argument. |
In the
|
I'm in doubt whether this library should support verification of solutions. It may be doable for classical VRP variants, such as CVRP and VRPTW, but I don't know if it's feasible for other variants. |
I have decided that this and #51 is not something we will support. Our library focuses on input/output of VRPLIB instances. Validating the instance content is outside the scope of this library. |
It would be nice to provide functions that can verify any VRP-type solution. Of course, we need to make a verification function for each type of VRP-type problem.
I have no idea yet how the interface will look like. But here's an idea:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: