Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Major] Comprehensive tests -- golden master and correctness #43

Closed
ElizabethSantorellaQC opened this issue Apr 16, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@ElizabethSantorellaQC
Copy link
Contributor

ElizabethSantorellaQC commented Apr 16, 2020

  • Every feature in sklearn should be used in some golden master test, so we can make sure we aren't breaking anything, especially for less-used features like warm starts
  • We should also confirm the correctness of sklearn solutions, perhaps by perturbing parameter values at the estimated optimum. This could be slow so we might not want to build it into the test suite. This is especially needed for gamma and Tweedie with regularization. Jan is confident in these since they have been tested against other software, but not with regularization.
@ElizabethSantorellaQC ElizabethSantorellaQC changed the title [Major] Comprehensive tests [Major] Comprehensive tests -- golden master and correctness Apr 16, 2020
@ElizabethSantorellaQC ElizabethSantorellaQC added the this week's work we're doing it now label Apr 16, 2020
@tbenthompson
Copy link
Collaborator

some things that we're not testing right now:

  • variable penalties
  • warm starting
  • fitting with no intercept

@ElizabethSantorellaQC
Copy link
Contributor Author

See #101

@tbenthompson
Copy link
Collaborator

We now have a nice set of golden master tests from PR #101. See Issue #111 for ongoing work to ensure that we're converging in all possible cases.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants