Minor fixes

[danghai]

I make PR to make minor fixes

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 398

• 3 of 11 (27.27%) changed or added relevant lines in 2 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage decreased (-0.04%) to 37.933%

---

Changes Missing Coverage	Covered Lines	Changed/Added Lines	%
sktm/patchwork.py	2	4	50.0%
sktm/init.py	1	7	14.29%

Totals
Change from base Build 391:	-0.04%
Covered Lines:	462
Relevant Lines:	1094

---

💛 - Coveralls

[veruu]

Thanks Hai! I have one small request, but besides that, I'd prefer to change the watcher and patchwork class renaming. The watcher class has a comment about how it needs to be properly renamed or refactored, so only fixing the capitalization isn't very useful. Similarly, the patchwork classes should get similar names to their parent, to make it reflect that they are specific interfaces to the project, and the name doesn't need to include "skt" either.

I'd either drop those three patches from the pull, or come up with appropriate names which don't need to be changed next time. What do you think?

[veruu]

Can we keep the imports in alphabetical order and remove the jenkins import below instead?

[danghai]

@veruu Thanks review. I do not come up with the name too. Do you have any suggestion for them. If not, I could probably drop them. What do you think?

[veruu]

For the watcher, I'd keep that one untouched for now. As you might have noticed from the other pulls we want to split job queuing and checking so in the end, the watcher may be simplified or split appropriately as well. For the Patchwork classes, what would you think about PatchworkV1Project and PatchworkV2Project, to note the version as well as the fact that it's the interface to the project and not whole Patchwork instance?

[danghai]

@veruu I drop the watcher's patch. The class names is good too, I fixed it. You can review now.

[veruu]

Thanks Hai, looks good!