Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

posix: missing functionality #7801

Open
1 of 2 tasks
kaspar030 opened this issue Oct 24, 2017 · 9 comments
Open
1 of 2 tasks

posix: missing functionality #7801

kaspar030 opened this issue Oct 24, 2017 · 9 comments
Assignees
Labels
Area: POSIX Area: POSIX API wrapper Type: new feature The issue requests / The PR implemements a new feature for RIOT

Comments

@kaspar030
Copy link
Contributor

kaspar030 commented Oct 24, 2017

(Update if need be)

@kaspar030
Copy link
Contributor Author

?

(there was a test comment which I deleted) I wanted to see if checkboxes in comments are possible and whether they're counted as if they're in the description. That would've allowed us to "vote" priority using github reactions. Unfortunately, it doesn't work that way.

@miri64 miri64 added Type: new feature The issue requests / The PR implemements a new feature for RIOT and removed Feature Request labels Sep 30, 2018
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Aug 10, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. If you want me to ignore this issue, please mark it with the "State: don't stale" label. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the State: stale State: The issue / PR has no activity for >185 days label Aug 10, 2019
@miri64
Copy link
Member

miri64 commented Aug 10, 2019

getaddrinfo() (see #841)

Can be implemented using sock_dns.

(p)select() (see #4222)

Requires asynchronous sock (see #11723)

@stale stale bot removed the State: stale State: The issue / PR has no activity for >185 days label Aug 10, 2019
@miri64 miri64 added State: don't stale State: Tell state-bot to ignore this issue and removed State: don't stale State: Tell state-bot to ignore this issue labels Aug 10, 2019
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Feb 11, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. If you want me to ignore this issue, please mark it with the "State: don't stale" label. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added State: stale State: The issue / PR has no activity for >185 days and removed State: stale State: The issue / PR has no activity for >185 days labels Feb 11, 2020
@miri64
Copy link
Member

miri64 commented Feb 11, 2020

select() is implemented in #12975.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Aug 14, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. If you want me to ignore this issue, please mark it with the "State: don't stale" label. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the State: stale State: The issue / PR has no activity for >185 days label Aug 14, 2020
@miri64 miri64 removed the State: stale State: The issue / PR has no activity for >185 days label Aug 14, 2020
@HendrikVE
Copy link
Contributor

+1 for an implementation of getaddrinfo for #15969

@miri64
Copy link
Member

miri64 commented Feb 9, 2021

getaddrinfo() (see #841)

Can be implemented using sock_dns.

This still should hold up true

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Mar 2, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. If you want me to ignore this issue, please mark it with the "State: don't stale" label. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the State: stale State: The issue / PR has no activity for >185 days label Mar 2, 2022
@miri64 miri64 removed the State: stale State: The issue / PR has no activity for >185 days label Mar 3, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area: POSIX Area: POSIX API wrapper Type: new feature The issue requests / The PR implemements a new feature for RIOT
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants