Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Versioning and Authorship for module/class/role/unit #2007

Open
nxadm opened this issue May 6, 2018 · 4 comments
Open

Versioning and Authorship for module/class/role/unit #2007

nxadm opened this issue May 6, 2018 · 4 comments
Labels
docs Documentation issue (primary issue type) NOTSPECCED need roast tests before documenting update part of "docs" - indicates this is an update for an existing section; rewrite, clarification, etc.
Milestone

Comments

@nxadm
Copy link
Contributor

nxadm commented May 6, 2018

:ver<> and :auth<> (see: https://docs.perl6.org/language/typesystem#Versioning_and_Authorship) is:

To clarify the doc, we should answer these questions:

  • can the adverbs ver and auth be used everywhere where a module/class/role/unit is created and consumed?
  • what is the canonical source of author? Are there certain limits when creating it (does it need an email address, how must it be formatted)? When consuming it, should it refer to a github handle, CPAN user, free text as defined in the module metadata?
@coke
Copy link
Collaborator

coke commented May 6, 2018

here & not here appear to be the same URL

@nxadm nxadm changed the title https://docs.perl6.org/language/typesystem#Versioning_and_Authorship Versioning and Authorship for module/class/role/unit May 6, 2018
@JJ JJ added the JJ TPF Grant label May 6, 2018
@JJ JJ added docs Documentation issue (primary issue type) update part of "docs" - indicates this is an update for an existing section; rewrite, clarification, etc. and removed JJ TPF Grant labels May 14, 2018
@JJ
Copy link
Contributor

JJ commented May 14, 2018

It's apparently not specced yet

@JJ JJ added the NOTSPECCED need roast tests before documenting label May 14, 2018
@JJ
Copy link
Contributor

JJ commented Jul 31, 2018

It is also repeated 4 times, with slightly different and context-aware name, through the typesystem document Maybe we should remove that, since it's not specced.

@JJ
Copy link
Contributor

JJ commented Jan 7, 2021

We should also take into account rakudo/rakudo#4159: they follow the colonpair syntax.

@coke coke added this to the backlog milestone Mar 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation issue (primary issue type) NOTSPECCED need roast tests before documenting update part of "docs" - indicates this is an update for an existing section; rewrite, clarification, etc.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants