Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added BERT v/s Raw Performance #191

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

Soubeer
Copy link
Contributor

@Soubeer Soubeer commented Jun 12, 2024

Related Issue

This pull request tackles the need for a detailed comparison of different text classification methods on the IMDB dataset. By comparing raw text processing, pre-trained BERT, and fine-tuned BERT models, I aim to highlight their performance differences. This analysis will help us understand which approach works best for sentiment analysis and guide future enhancements. It provides valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of each method, helping to make informed decisions for upcoming projects in the repository.

About Issue #188

Description

In this pull request, I've conducted a comparative study of text classification methods on the IMDB dataset: raw text processing, pre-trained BERT, and fine-tuned BERT models. BERT, known for its deep bidirectional representations, is evaluated both in its pre-trained state and after fine-tuning on the IMDB dataset. Fine-tuning involves further training BERT on our specific dataset, enhancing its performance by capturing domain-specific nuances. The analysis includes training, validation, and performance metrics for each method, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. This comparison aims to guide future development and optimization efforts in our repository, ensuring the use of the most effective text classification methods.

Type of PR

  • Bug fix
  • [✓ ] Feature enhancement
  • Documentation update
  • Other (specify): _______________

Screenshots / videos (if applicable)

[Attach any relevant screenshots or videos demonstrating the changes]

(Not really required,already present in notebook file)

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have read and followed the Contribution Guidelines.
  • I have tested the changes thoroughly before submitting this pull request.
  • I have provided relevant issue numbers, screenshots, and videos after making the changes.
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.

Additional context:

I have not added a READme and have made the whole thing inside a new folder named raw_bert_finetune..should I change it or add something?

Copy link
Member

@sanjay-kv sanjay-kv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this never helps , unlike machine learning repo we cant do contribution in this way. you have to integrate to the existing files or enhancement.

Copy link

This PR has been automatically closed due to inactivity from the owner for 15 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Jun 28, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Jun 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants