Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

the score of deliciousLarge #26

Closed
YuMiaoTHU opened this issue Oct 29, 2019 · 0 comments
Closed

the score of deliciousLarge #26

YuMiaoTHU opened this issue Oct 29, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@YuMiaoTHU
Copy link

Hi! when you use fxml.py delicious.model deliciousLarge_train.txt --standard-dataset --verbose train --iters 5 --trees 20 --label-weight propensity --alpha 1e-4 --leaf-classifiers --no-remap-labels to train and use fxml.py delicious.model deliciousLarge_test.txt --standard-dataset inference to test,
what is the final result?
I get very low score, like that:
P@1: 0.4287878787878788 P@3: 0.38484848484848483 P@5: 0.3565656565656566 NDCG@1: 0.4287878787878788 NDCG@3: 0.3957641604407556 NDCG@5: 0.3747889067931902 pNDCG@1: 0.45656907373737377 pNDCG@3: 0.41984043916568803 pNDCG@5: 0.396182084153063

@YuMiaoTHU YuMiaoTHU changed the title the score of the score of deliciousLarge Oct 29, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant