You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
http://usecases.responsiveimages.org/ lists src-N as 4th proposal in section 1.1.
While I find the title of the proposal (“Proposal for RespImg Syntax”) very confusing (“src-N Approach” would be better IMO), I think this proposal has been deprecated and shouldn’t be listed here anymore as the section description says it lists all in-development specifications.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I agree we should change the wording, but I think it's nice to keep it in the document because it's a nice piece of the historical record. We should just add a note that src-n is not longer being perused as a solution .
I agree we should change the wording, but I think it's nice to keep it in the document because it's a nice piece of the historical record. We should just add a note that src-n is not longer being perused as a solution .
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
http://usecases.responsiveimages.org/ lists src-N as 4th proposal in section 1.1.
While I find the title of the proposal (“Proposal for RespImg Syntax”) very confusing (“src-N Approach” would be better IMO), I think this proposal has been deprecated and shouldn’t be listed here anymore as the section description says it lists all in-development specifications.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: