Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Section 1.1 still has src-N listed as 'in-development' solution #53

Closed
anselmh opened this issue May 8, 2014 · 2 comments · Fixed by #54
Closed

Section 1.1 still has src-N listed as 'in-development' solution #53

anselmh opened this issue May 8, 2014 · 2 comments · Fixed by #54
Labels

Comments

@anselmh
Copy link
Member

anselmh commented May 8, 2014

http://usecases.responsiveimages.org/ lists src-N as 4th proposal in section 1.1.
While I find the title of the proposal (“Proposal for RespImg Syntax”) very confusing (“src-N Approach” would be better IMO), I think this proposal has been deprecated and shouldn’t be listed here anymore as the section description says it lists all in-development specifications.

@anselmh anselmh added the bug label May 8, 2014
@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Contributor

I agree we should change the wording, but I think it's nice to keep it in the document because it's a nice piece of the historical record. We should just add a note that src-n is not longer being perused as a solution .

@anselmh
Copy link
Member Author

anselmh commented May 8, 2014

Sure :)

On 08 May 2014, at 19:09, Marcos Caceres notifications@github.com wrote:

I agree we should change the wording, but I think it's nice to keep it in the document because it's a nice piece of the historical record. We should just add a note that src-n is not longer being perused as a solution .


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

anselmh added a commit that referenced this issue May 11, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants