Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Epic: NSwag v14 #2181

Closed
3 of 5 tasks
RicoSuter opened this issue May 21, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed
3 of 5 tasks

Epic: NSwag v14 #2181

RicoSuter opened this issue May 21, 2019 · 5 comments

Comments

@RicoSuter
Copy link
Owner

RicoSuter commented May 21, 2019

We are now working on NSwag v14 and NJsonSchema v11.

Breaking changes:

  • Removed some deprecated methods/properties
  • Drop classic ASP.NET and full/legacy .NET support (?)
  • Remove option to load assemblies (only project loading supported) (?)

Tasks (not sure they'll get in)

@RicoSuter RicoSuter mentioned this issue May 21, 2019
11 tasks
@RicoSuter RicoSuter pinned this issue Nov 25, 2021
@olenitsj
Copy link

olenitsj commented Aug 22, 2022

@RicoSuter,

Does this mean NSwag will not support asp .net framework(OWIN) from v14?
If so, how long do you expect to support v13 with security/bug fixes?

@RicoSuter
Copy link
Owner Author

RicoSuter commented Mar 12, 2023

@olenitsj yes, I think this is the plan - there was enough time to migrate to .NET Core - and this is a free, open source product.
Probably there wont be many patches as it's too time consuming and anyway not paid. If we can keep it in some form, we'll keep it.

@kapsiR
Copy link
Contributor

kapsiR commented May 23, 2023

If we can keep it in some form, we'll keep it.

Would be cool to have support for the latest .NET Framework v4.8.* 😉

@Saibamen
Copy link

Saibamen commented Sep 7, 2023

there was enough time to migrate to .NET Core

We all know we don't like supporting legacy apps, frameworks, SKDs etc... and (Hello) World will be a better place for us if all Customers will use latest versions, so we could use latest solutions etc... but...

There are still big projects with active development not yet migrated to .NET Core/.NET 6 LTS or in the middle of migration - so we need Swagger support for both WebAPIs to compare these. A lot of changes were made in routing area for .NET Core.

And because of active development, developers can't have enough time to working ONLY on migrating and testing new APIs - especially on small companies.

@patrickklaeren
Copy link

there was enough time to migrate to .NET Core

We all know we don't like supporting legacy apps, frameworks, SKDs etc... and (Hello) World will be a better place for us if all Customers will use latest versions, so we could use latest solutions etc... but...

There are still big projects with active development not yet migrated to .NET Core/.NET 6 LTS or in the middle of migration - so we need Swagger support for both WebAPIs to compare these. A lot of changes were made in routing area for .NET Core.

And because of active development, developers can't have enough time to working ONLY on migrating and testing new APIs - especially on small companies.

Dropping support in new versions doesn't mean the version you're using at the moment will stop working :)

@RicoSuter RicoSuter unpinned this issue Sep 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants