You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for the good work on graph condensation. I am recently working on this topic. When I read the proof of proposition 1, I had the following confusions.
1). In Eq. (12), do the subscript i and j both start from 0 or 1? In the current form, i starts from 0 while j starts from 1.
2). In Eq. (14), the outer integral is combined. Howover, the form of Eq. (14) does't make sense as the two matrices in the bracket have different sizes. Although I do understand the implication here, it seems the form of Eq. (14) needs to be revised? Once the form is revised, the transition from Eq. (14) to Eq. (15) could be more smooth.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
Thanks for the good work on graph condensation. I am recently working on this topic. When I read the proof of proposition 1, I had the following confusions.
1). In Eq. (12), do the subscript i and j both start from 0 or 1? In the current form, i starts from 0 while j starts from 1.
2). In Eq. (14), the outer integral is combined. Howover, the form of Eq. (14) does't make sense as the two matrices in the bracket have different sizes. Although I do understand the implication here, it seems the form of Eq. (14) needs to be revised? Once the form is revised, the transition from Eq. (14) to Eq. (15) could be more smooth.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: