Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Confusion about the proof #5

Open
Coder-Yu opened this issue Jan 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Confusion about the proof #5

Coder-Yu opened this issue Jan 25, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@Coder-Yu
Copy link

Hi,

Thanks for the good work on graph condensation. I am recently working on this topic. When I read the proof of proposition 1, I had the following confusions.
1). In Eq. (12), do the subscript i and j both start from 0 or 1? In the current form, i starts from 0 while j starts from 1.
2). In Eq. (14), the outer integral is combined. Howover, the form of Eq. (14) does't make sense as the two matrices in the bracket have different sizes. Although I do understand the implication here, it seems the form of Eq. (14) needs to be revised? Once the form is revised, the transition from Eq. (14) to Eq. (15) could be more smooth.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant