Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove warning for clang 3.8 #486

Closed
adam900710 opened this issue May 16, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Remove warning for clang 3.8 #486

adam900710 opened this issue May 16, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@adam900710
Copy link

adam900710 commented May 16, 2016

EDITED:
Please remove the warning on slow completion after upgrading to clang 3.8.

"engine/engine.h" 44L, 722C
WARNING: libclang can not find the builtin includes.
         This will cause slow code completion.
         Please report the problem.

As I find the completion speed even improved a little.

ORIGINAL ISSUE:
Any idea on support for clang 3.8?

Some distro like arch is moving to clang 3.8, although it's still providing clang 3.5 for compatibility, but clang 3.5 will eventually fade out.

So is there any plan on support for clang 3.8?
Thanks

@graywolf
Copy link
Contributor

Did you try it? I'm using Arch and even though clang_complete complains about

"engine/engine.h" 44L, 722C
WARNING: libclang can not find the builtin includes.
         This will cause slow code completion.
         Please report the problem.

it doesn't have any effect on completion speed (at least it doesn't seem to have). So I would say: "Works fine for me".

@adam900710
Copy link
Author

Yes, completely the same output, and that's why I submitted this issue.

Except the warning, didn't see any slowdown though.(Maybe even a little faster?)

Then the bug is better to be renamed to "Remove warning for clang 3.8"?

@adam900710 adam900710 changed the title Support for clang 3.8? Remove warning for clang 3.8 May 16, 2016
@xaizek xaizek closed this as completed in 3c1a6ff May 25, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants