In OLAP workload, 2^32 rows is quickly reached. This limitation impedes the use of roaring bitmaps as bitmap indices on such system.
It seems the implementation (and the paper) are strongly built on 2^32 assumption. What are the implication of growing the number of buckets vs the size of a bucket?
In OLAP workload, 2^32 rows is quickly reached. This limitation impedes the use of roaring bitmaps as bitmap indices on such system.
It seems the implementation (and the paper) are strongly built on 2^32 assumption. What are the implication of growing the number of buckets vs the size of a bucket?