ulab
is a numpy
-like module for micropython
and its derivatives, meant to simplify and speed up common mathematical operations on arrays. ulab
implements a small subset of numpy
and scipy
. The functions were chosen such that they might be useful in the context of a microcontroller. However, the project is a living one, and suggestions for new features are always welcome.
This document discusses how you can use the library, starting from building your own firmware, through questions like what affects the firmware size, what are the trade-offs, and what are the most important differences to numpy
and scipy
, respectively. The document is organised as follows:
The chapter after this one helps you with firmware customisation.
The third chapter gives a very concise summary of the ulab
functions and array methods. This chapter can be used as a quick reference.
The chapters after that are an in-depth review of most functions. Here you can find usage examples, benchmarks, as well as a thorough discussion of such concepts as broadcasting, and views versus copies.
The final chapter of this book can be regarded as the programming manual. The inner working of ulab
is dissected here, and you will also find hints as to how to implement your own numpy
-compatible functions.
Of course, the first question that one has to answer is, why on Earth one would need a fast math library on a microcontroller. After all, it is not expected that heavy number crunching is going to take place on bare metal. It is not meant to. On a PC, the main reason for writing fast code is the sheer amount of data that one wants to process. On a microcontroller, the data volume is probably small, but it might lead to catastrophic system failure, if these data are not processed in time, because the microcontroller is supposed to interact with the outside world in a timely fashion. In fact, this latter objective was the initiator of this project: I needed the Fourier transform of a signal coming from the ADC of the pyboard
, and all available options were simply too slow.
In addition to speed, another issue that one has to keep in mind when working with embedded systems is the amount of available RAM: I believe, everything here could be implemented in pure python
with relatively little effort (in fact, there are a couple of python
-only implementations of numpy
functions out there), but the price we would have to pay for that is not only speed, but RAM, too. python
code, if is not frozen, and compiled into the firmware, has to be compiled at runtime, which is not exactly a cheap process. On top of that, if numbers are stored in a list or tuple, which would be the high-level container, then they occupy 8 bytes, no matter, whether they are all smaller than 100, or larger than one hundred million. This is obviously a waste of resources in an environment, where resources are scarce.
Finally, there is a reason for using micropython
in the first place. Namely, that a microcontroller can be programmed in a very elegant, and pythonic way. But if it is so, why should we not extend this idea to other tasks and concepts that might come up in this context? If there was no other reason than this elegance, I would find that convincing enough.
Based on the above-mentioned considerations, all functions in ulab
are implemented in a way that
- conforms to
numpy
as much as possible - is so frugal with RAM as possible,
- and yet, fast. Much faster than pure python. Think of speed-ups of 30-50!
The main points of ulab
are
- compact, iterable and slicable containers of numerical data in one to four dimensions. These containers support all the relevant unary and binary operators (e.g.,
len
, ==, +, *, etc.) - vectorised computations on
micropython
iterables and numerical arrays (innumpy
-speak, universal functions) - computing statistical properties (mean, standard deviation etc.) on arrays
- basic linear algebra routines (matrix inversion, multiplication, reshaping, transposition, determinant, and eigenvalues, Cholesky decomposition and so on)
- polynomial fits to numerical data, and evaluation of polynomials
- fast Fourier transforms
- filtering of data (convolution and second-order filters)
- function minimisation, fitting, and numerical approximation routines
ulab
implements close to a hundred functions and array methods. At the time of writing this manual (for version 2.1.0), the library adds approximately 120 kB of extra compiled code to the micropython
(pyboard.v.11) firmware. However, if you are tight with flash space, you can easily shave tens of kB off the firmware. In fact, if only a small sub-set of functions are needed, you can get away with less than 10 kB of flash space. See the section on customising ulab.
The source code of the module can be found under https://github.com/v923z/micropython-ulab/tree/master/code. while the source of this user manual is under https://github.com/v923z/micropython-ulab/tree/master/docs.
The MIT licence applies to all material.
If you use ulab
, and bump into a bug, or think that a particular function is missing, or its behaviour does not conform to numpy
, please, raise a ulab issue on github, so that the community can profit from your experiences.
Even better, if you find the project to be useful, and think that it could be made better, faster, tighter, and shinier, please, consider contributing, and issue a pull request with the implementation of your improvements and new features. ulab
can only become successful, if it offers what the community needs.
These last comments apply to the documentation, too. If, in your opinion, the documentation is obscure, misleading, or not detailed enough, please, let us know, so that we can fix it.
ulab
has originally been developed for micropython
, but has since been integrated into a number of its flavours. Most of these flavours are simply forks of micropython
itself, with some additional functionality. One of the notable exceptions is circuitpython
, which has slightly diverged at the core level, and this has some minor consequences. Some of these concern the C implementation details only, which all have been sorted out with the generous and enthusiastic support of Jeff Epler from Adafruit Industries.
There are, however, a couple of instances, where the two environments differ at the python level in how the class properties can be accessed. We will point out the differences and possible workarounds at the relevant places in this document.
As mentioned above, ulab
has considerably grown since its conception, which also means that it might no longer fit on the microcontroller of your choice. There are, however, a couple of ways of customising the firmware, and thereby reducing its size.
All ulab
options are listed in a single header file, ulab.h, which contains pre-processor flags for each feature that can be fine-tuned. The first couple of lines of the file look like this
// The pre-processor constants in this file determine how ulab behaves:
//
// - how many dimensions ulab can handle
// - which functions are included in the compiled firmware
// - whether the python syntax is numpy-like, or modular
// - whether arrays can be sliced and iterated over
// - which binary/unary operators are supported
//
// A considerable amount of flash space can be saved by removing (setting
// the corresponding constants to 0) the unnecessary functions and features.
// Determines, whether scipy is defined in ulab. The sub-modules and functions
// of scipy have to be defined separately
#define ULAB_HAS_SCIPY (1)
// The maximum number of dimensions the firmware should be able to support
// Possible values lie between 1, and 4, inclusive
#define ULAB_MAX_DIMS 2
// By setting this constant to 1, iteration over array dimensions will be implemented
// as a function (ndarray_rewind_array), instead of writing out the loops in macros
// This reduces firmware size at the expense of speed
#define ULAB_HAS_FUNCTION_ITERATOR (0)
// If NDARRAY_IS_ITERABLE is 1, the ndarray object defines its own iterator function
// This option saves approx. 250 bytes of flash space
#define NDARRAY_IS_ITERABLE (1)
// Slicing can be switched off by setting this variable to 0
#define NDARRAY_IS_SLICEABLE (1)
// The default threshold for pretty printing. These variables can be overwritten
// at run-time via the set_printoptions() function
#define ULAB_HAS_PRINTOPTIONS (1)
#define NDARRAY_PRINT_THRESHOLD 10
#define NDARRAY_PRINT_EDGEITEMS 3
// determines, whether the dtype is an object, or simply a character
// the object implementation is numpythonic, but requires more space
#define ULAB_HAS_DTYPE_OBJECT (0)
// the ndarray binary operators
#define NDARRAY_HAS_BINARY_OPS (1)
// Firmware size can be reduced at the expense of speed by using function
// pointers in iterations. For each operator, he function pointer saves around
// 2 kB in the two-dimensional case, and around 4 kB in the four-dimensional case.
#define NDARRAY_BINARY_USES_FUN_POINTER (0)
#define NDARRAY_HAS_BINARY_OP_ADD (1)
#define NDARRAY_HAS_BINARY_OP_EQUAL (1)
#define NDARRAY_HAS_BINARY_OP_LESS (1)
#define NDARRAY_HAS_BINARY_OP_LESS_EQUAL (1)
#define NDARRAY_HAS_BINARY_OP_MORE (1)
#define NDARRAY_HAS_BINARY_OP_MORE_EQUAL (1)
#define NDARRAY_HAS_BINARY_OP_MULTIPLY (1)
#define NDARRAY_HAS_BINARY_OP_NOT_EQUAL (1)
#define NDARRAY_HAS_BINARY_OP_POWER (1)
#define NDARRAY_HAS_BINARY_OP_SUBTRACT (1)
#define NDARRAY_HAS_BINARY_OP_TRUE_DIVIDE (1)
...
The meaning of flags with names _HAS_
should be obvious, so we will just explain the other options.
To see how much you can gain by un-setting the functions that you do not need, here are some pointers. In four dimensions, including all functions adds around 120 kB to the micropython
firmware. On the other hand, if you are interested in Fourier transforms only, and strip everything else, you get away with less than 5 kB extra.
The functions implemented in ulab
are organised in three sub-modules at the C level, namely, numpy
, scipy
, and user
. This modularity is elevated to python
, meaning that in order to use functions that are part of numpy
, you have to import numpy
as
from ulab import numpy as np
x = np.array([4, 5, 6])
p = np.array([1, 2, 3])
np.polyval(p, x)
There are a couple of exceptions to this rule, namely fft
, and linalg
, which are sub-modules even in numpy
, thus you have to write them out as
from ulab import numpy as np
A = np.array([1, 2, 3, 4]).reshape()
np.linalg.trace(A)
Some of the functions in ulab
are re-implementations of scipy
functions, and they are to be imported as
from ulab import numpy as np
from ulab import scipy as spy
x = np.array([1, 2, 3])
spy.special.erf(x)
numpy
-compatibility has an enormous benefit : namely, by try
ing to import
, we can guarantee that the same, unmodified code runs in CPython
, as in micropython
. The following snippet is platform-independent, thus, the python
code can be tested and debugged on a computer before loading it onto the microcontroller.
try:
from ulab import numpy as np
from ulab import scipy as spy
except ImportError:
import numpy as np
import scipy as spy
x = np.array([1, 2, 3])
spy.special.erf(x)
ulab
supports tensors of rank four, but this is expensive in terms of flash: with all available functions and options, the library adds around 100 kB to the firmware. However, if such high dimensions are not required, significant reductions in size can be gotten by changing the value of
#define ULAB_MAX_DIMS 2
Two dimensions cost a bit more than half of four, while you can get away with around 20 kB of flash in one dimension, because all those functions that don’t make sense (e.g., matrix inversion, eigenvalues etc.) are automatically stripped from the firmware.
In higher dimensions, the firmware size increases, because each dimension (axis) adds another level of nested loops. An example of this is the macro of the binary operator in three dimensions
#define BINARY_LOOP(results, type_out, type_left, type_right, larray, lstrides, rarray, rstrides, OPERATOR)
type_out *array = (type_out *)results->array;
size_t j = 0;
do {
size_t k = 0;
do {
size_t l = 0;
do {
*array++ = *((type_left *)(larray)) OPERATOR *((type_right *)(rarray));
(larray) += (lstrides)[ULAB_MAX_DIMS - 1];
(rarray) += (rstrides)[ULAB_MAX_DIMS - 1];
l++;
} while(l < (results)->shape[ULAB_MAX_DIMS - 1]);
(larray) -= (lstrides)[ULAB_MAX_DIMS - 1] * (results)->shape[ULAB_MAX_DIMS-1];
(larray) += (lstrides)[ULAB_MAX_DIMS - 2];
(rarray) -= (rstrides)[ULAB_MAX_DIMS - 1] * (results)->shape[ULAB_MAX_DIMS-1];
(rarray) += (rstrides)[ULAB_MAX_DIMS - 2];
k++;
} while(k < (results)->shape[ULAB_MAX_DIMS - 2]);
(larray) -= (lstrides)[ULAB_MAX_DIMS - 2] * results->shape[ULAB_MAX_DIMS-2];
(larray) += (lstrides)[ULAB_MAX_DIMS - 3];
(rarray) -= (rstrides)[ULAB_MAX_DIMS - 2] * results->shape[ULAB_MAX_DIMS-2];
(rarray) += (rstrides)[ULAB_MAX_DIMS - 3];
j++;
} while(j < (results)->shape[ULAB_MAX_DIMS - 3]);
In order to reduce firmware size, it might make sense in higher dimensions to make use of the function iterator by setting the
#define ULAB_HAS_FUNCTION_ITERATOR (1)
constant to 1. This allows the compiler to call the ndarray_rewind_array
function, so that it doesn’t have to unwrap the loops for k
, and j
. Instead of the macro above, we now have
#define BINARY_LOOP(results, type_out, type_left, type_right, larray, lstrides, rarray, rstrides, OPERATOR)
type_out *array = (type_out *)(results)->array;
size_t *lcoords = ndarray_new_coords((results)->ndim);
size_t *rcoords = ndarray_new_coords((results)->ndim);
for(size_t i=0; i < (results)->len/(results)->shape[ULAB_MAX_DIMS -1]; i++) {
size_t l = 0;
do {
*array++ = *((type_left *)(larray)) OPERATOR *((type_right *)(rarray));
(larray) += (lstrides)[ULAB_MAX_DIMS - 1];
(rarray) += (rstrides)[ULAB_MAX_DIMS - 1];
l++;
} while(l < (results)->shape[ULAB_MAX_DIMS - 1]);
ndarray_rewind_array((results)->ndim, larray, (results)->shape, lstrides, lcoords);
ndarray_rewind_array((results)->ndim, rarray, (results)->shape, rstrides, rcoords);
} while(0)
Since the ndarray_rewind_array
function is implemented only once, a lot of space can be saved. Obviously, function calls cost time, thus such trade-offs must be evaluated for each application. The gain also depends on which functions and features you include. Operators and functions that involve two arrays are expensive, because at the C level, the number of cases that must be handled scales with the squares of the number of data types. As an example, the innocent-looking expression
from ulab import numpy as np
a = np.array([1, 2, 3])
b = np.array([4, 5, 6])
c = a + b
requires 25 loops in C, because the dtypes
of both a
, and b
can assume 5 different values, and the addition has to be resolved for all possible cases. Hint: each binary operator costs between 3 and 4 kB in two dimensions.
As is customary with python
packages, information on the package version can be found be querying the __version__
string.
# code to be run in micropython
import ulab
print('you are running ulab version', ulab.__version__)
you are running ulab version 2.1.0-2D
The first three numbers indicate the major, minor, and sub-minor versions of ulab
(defined by the ULAB_VERSION
constant in ulab.c). We usually change the minor version, whenever a new function is added to the code, and the sub-minor version will be incremented, if a bug fix is implemented.
2D
tells us that the particular firmware supports tensors of rank 2 (defined by ULAB_MAX_DIMS
in ulab.h).
If you find a bug, please, include the version string in your report!
Should you need the numerical value of ULAB_MAX_DIMS
, you can get it from the version string in the following way:
# code to be run in micropython
import ulab
version = ulab.__version__
version_dims = version.split('-')[1]
version_num = int(version_dims.replace('D', ''))
print('version string: ', version)
print('version dimensions: ', version_dims)
print('numerical value of dimensions: ', version_num)
version string: 2.1.0-2D version dimensions: 2D numerical value of dimensions: 2
ulab
implements a number of array operators and functions, but this does not mean that all of these functions and methods are actually compiled into the firmware. You can fine-tune your firmware by setting/unsetting any of the _HAS_
constants in ulab.h.
The version string will not tell you everything about your firmware, because the supported functions and sub-modules can still arbitrarily be included or excluded. One way of finding out what is compiled into the firmware is calling dir
with ulab
as its argument.
# code to be run in micropython
from ulab import numpy as np
from ulab import scipy as spy
print('===== constants, functions, and modules of numpy =====\n\n', dir(np))
# since fft and linalg are sub-modules, print them separately
print('\nfunctions included in the fft module:\n', dir(np.fft))
print('\nfunctions included in the linalg module:\n', dir(np.linalg))
print('\n\n===== modules of scipy =====\n\n', dir(spy))
print('\nfunctions included in the optimize module:\n', dir(spy.optimize))
print('\nfunctions included in the signal module:\n', dir(spy.signal))
print('\nfunctions included in the special module:\n', dir(spy.special))
===== constants, functions, and modules of numpy =====
['__class__', '__name__', 'bool', 'sort', 'sum', 'acos', 'acosh', 'arange', 'arctan2', 'argmax', 'argmin', 'argsort', 'around', 'array', 'asin', 'asinh', 'atan', 'atanh', 'ceil', 'clip', 'concatenate', 'convolve', 'cos', 'cosh', 'cross', 'degrees', 'diag', 'diff', 'e', 'equal', 'exp', 'expm1', 'eye', 'fft', 'flip', 'float', 'floor', 'frombuffer', 'full', 'get_printoptions', 'inf', 'int16', 'int8', 'interp', 'linalg', 'linspace', 'log', 'log10', 'log2', 'logspace', 'max', 'maximum', 'mean', 'median', 'min', 'minimum', 'nan', 'ndinfo', 'not_equal', 'ones', 'pi', 'polyfit', 'polyval', 'radians', 'roll', 'set_printoptions', 'sin', 'sinh', 'sqrt', 'std', 'tan', 'tanh', 'trapz', 'uint16', 'uint8', 'vectorize', 'zeros']
- functions included in the fft module:
['__class__', '__name__', 'fft', 'ifft']
- functions included in the linalg module:
['__class__', '__name__', 'cholesky', 'det', 'dot', 'eig', 'inv', 'norm', 'trace']
===== modules of scipy =====
['__class__', '__name__', 'optimize', 'signal', 'special']
- functions included in the optimize module:
['__class__', '__name__', 'bisect', 'fmin', 'newton']
- functions included in the signal module:
['__class__', '__name__', 'sosfilt', 'spectrogram']
- functions included in the special module:
['__class__', '__name__', 'erf', 'erfc', 'gamma', 'gammaln']
The dir
function applied to the module or its sub-modules gives information on what the module and sub-modules include, but is not enough to find out which methods the ndarray
class supports. We can list the methods by calling dir
with the array
object itself:
# code to be run in micropython
from ulab import numpy as np
print(dir(np.array))
['__class__', '__name__', 'copy', 'sort', '__bases__', '__dict__', 'dtype', 'flatten', 'itemsize', 'reshape', 'shape', 'size', 'strides', 'tobytes', 'transpose']
A list of operators cannot be generated as shown above. If you really need to find out, whether, e.g., the **
operator is supported by the firmware, you have to try
it:
# code to be run in micropython
from ulab import numpy as np
a = np.array([1, 2, 3])
b = np.array([4, 5, 6])
try:
print(a ** b)
except Exception as e:
print('operator is not supported: ', e)
operator is not supported: unsupported types for __pow__: 'ndarray', 'ndarray'
The exception above would be raised, if the firmware was compiled with the
#define NDARRAY_HAS_BINARY_OP_POWER (0)
definition.