Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

kysely-bun-worker vs kysely-bun-sqlite #153

Open
angelxmoreno opened this issue May 4, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

kysely-bun-worker vs kysely-bun-sqlite #153

angelxmoreno opened this issue May 4, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@angelxmoreno
Copy link

angelxmoreno commented May 4, 2024

kysely-bun-worker and kysely-bun-sqlite are two different dialects that work with bun:sqlite. However, internally the naming used for the kysely-bun-worker dialect is called bun-sqlite. At first glance the name implies that kysely-bun-sqlite is what is used internally. It took me sometime to figure out why my setup wasn't working because of this confusion.

In my app I am using kysely-bun-sqlite and I am unable to use codegen. I'd like to propose we rename the current dialect from bun-sqlite to bun-sqlite-worker and include the kysely-bun-sqlite dialect to avoid future confusion.

Upvote & Fund

  • We're using Polar.sh so you can upvote and help fund this issue.
  • We receive the funding once the issue is completed & confirmed by you.
  • Thank you in advance for helping prioritize & fund our backlog.
Fund with Polar
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant