Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

log4j security issue #23927

Closed
srkunze opened this issue Dec 10, 2021 · 7 comments
Closed

log4j security issue #23927

srkunze opened this issue Dec 10, 2021 · 7 comments

Comments

@srkunze
Copy link

srkunze commented Dec 10, 2021

Just one question regarding the vulnerability of log4j. Is RocketChat affected?

@debdutdeb
Copy link
Member

Hi, we don't have any dependencies on log4j, thus we shouldn't be affected.

I'll confirm with our engineering team. Closing this since not a bug.

@Philipp3211
Copy link

@debdutdeb Has the engineering team confirmed, that you are not affected?

@debdutdeb
Copy link
Member

Yes @Philipp3211 :)

@derspotter
Copy link

I think this is incorrect. With sudo find / -name "log4j*" I found .../app/bundle/programs/server/npm/node_modules/moleculer/src/loggers/log4js.js I believe this is in rocket.chat or am I mistaken?

@gronke
Copy link

gronke commented Dec 14, 2021

From https://github.com/log4js-node/log4js-node/blob/master/README.md

Although it's got a similar name to the Java library log4j, thinking that it will behave the same way will only bring you sorrow and confusion.

@derspotter
Copy link

From https://github.com/log4js-node/log4js-node/blob/master/README.md

Although it's got a similar name to the Java library log4j, thinking that it will behave the same way will only bring you sorrow and confusion.

So log4js is not affected? I am relieved. Thank you for the fast answer.

@fdellwing
Copy link

This is a Java specific bug, the same library in any other language will not have this problem.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants