Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about inverse propensity score loss #1

Closed
shi-ang opened this issue Oct 7, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

Question about inverse propensity score loss #1

shi-ang opened this issue Oct 7, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@shi-ang
Copy link

shi-ang commented Oct 7, 2021

Hi Zifeng,

I read your paper on Arxiv and got interested in the inverse propensity score loss that you implemented for debiasing the competing events. However, I still have some questions about this and hope you can help me with them.

I can see from the paper that IPS-weighting, equation, is trained to estimate the true distribution of the competing events. Based on your equation 20, equation, this IPS weighting is seemed to be obtained from scratch using a different model, not a downstream model after the latent representation equation.

However, I didn't find this implementation in this repo. Can you let me know in which part did you implement this IPS loss? Sorry if the questions are naive or due to my carelessness. I'm looking forward to hearing from you.

Best,
Shiang

@RyanWangZf
Copy link
Owner

RyanWangZf commented Oct 7, 2021

Hi there, this weight can be obtained by an additional logistic regression model. The input x can be raw features of patients. So no need of using learned representations. It has been proved that too precise inverse propensity weight can induce high variance (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1602.05352.pdf), so we should not use a too strong model for estimating IPS.

The current repo does not include it and the multi-task learning part. I will update the implementation later. Thanks for your attention!

@shi-ang
Copy link
Author

shi-ang commented Oct 7, 2021

Thanks for your reply! Looking forward to your future updates.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants