Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

femur_cut shouldn't require user interaction after a long time unzipping data #1102

Closed
cchriste opened this issue Mar 4, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed

Comments

@cchriste
Copy link
Contributor

cchriste commented Mar 4, 2021

After download gigabytes of data, the user is asked:

Use ispotropic spacing for mesh rasterization? y/n
@akenmorris
Copy link
Contributor

Additionally, can we provide recommended values for the spacing? I answered "no" to the "ispotropic" [sic] question and it's asking me for x, y, and z spacing. Since we are providing this dataset, perhaps we should give a suggestion. Is 1.0/1.0/1.0 ok?

@jadie1
Copy link
Contributor

jadie1 commented Mar 4, 2021

Isotropic spacing is okay and should be used on this dataset. We decided to add an option for different spacing so that if a user takes this use case and adapts it for their own data they are not locked into isotropic spacing. When we redo all of the use cases I can take this interaction out since it will be clear where the spacing is defined and passed.

@iyerkrithika21
Copy link
Contributor

For now, should we interchange the order of execution?
Ask about the spacing first and then proceed to the data download?

@jadie1
Copy link
Contributor

jadie1 commented Mar 4, 2021

For now, should we interchange the order of execution?
Ask about the spacing first and then proceed to the data download?

Yeah that should be fine

@cchriste
Copy link
Contributor Author

great!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants