Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MISSING: Message-Security-Assist Extension 5 #42

Closed
Fish-Git opened this issue Nov 28, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

MISSING: Message-Security-Assist Extension 5 #42

Fish-Git opened this issue Nov 28, 2017 · 1 comment
Labels
(*MOVED*) (the original issue was moved into a different issue)

Comments

@Fish-Git
Copy link
Member

Fish-Git commented Nov 28, 2017

Message-Security-Assist Extension 5   (March, 2015)

The message-security-assist extension 5 provides support for deterministic pseudorandom-number seeding and generation that conforms to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) special publication 800-90A. The message-security-assist extension 5 may be available on models implementing the z/Architecture architectural mode. The extension provides the following instruction:

  • PERFORM RANDOM NUMBER OPERATION (PRNO)

The PERFORM RANDOM NUMBER OPERATION instruction provides the following functions:

  • PRNO-Query
  • PRNO-SHA-512-DRNG

The message-security-assist extension 5 requires the secure-hash-algorithm (SHA-512) capabilities of the message-security-assist extension 2 as a prerequisite.

Note: The PERFORM RANDOM NUMBER OPERATION instruction was formerly named PERFORM PSEUDORANDOM NUMBER OPERATION. With the addition of the message-security-assist extension 7, the same instruction is also capable of generating true random numbers, hence the name change. The former mnemonic PPNO is deprecated, but is still retained.

@Fish-Git Fish-Git added the Missing Support for the described architectural feature is currently missing and needs to be added. label Nov 29, 2017
@Fish-Git Fish-Git added (*MOVED*) (the original issue was moved into a different issue) and removed Missing Support for the described architectural feature is currently missing and needs to be added. labels Dec 18, 2017
@Fish-Git
Copy link
Member Author

Moved to combined issue #77 "MISSING Facilities support".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
(*MOVED*) (the original issue was moved into a different issue)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant