Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cardinality of dcat:downloadURL #93

Closed
claaboudi opened this issue Oct 7, 2019 · 6 comments
Closed

Cardinality of dcat:downloadURL #93

claaboudi opened this issue Oct 7, 2019 · 6 comments

Comments

@claaboudi
Copy link

Cardinality of dcat:downloadURL (optional) should be 0...n (instead of 1...n).

@bertvannuffelen
Copy link
Contributor

@claaboudi this is the outcome of the proposal in #49.
From the changelog, the proposed restriction are:

  • dcat :accessURL, Cardinality: 1..n -> 1..1 (mandatory property)
  • dcat :downloadURL, Cardinality: 0..n -> 0..1 (optional property)

but on page 17 of the specification:

  • dcat:downloadURL is still 1..n instead (to be corrected)

The occurrence of accessURL is correct in the specification.

@bertvannuffelen bertvannuffelen added this to resolution proposed in dcat-ap release 2.0 Oct 17, 2019
@init-dcat-ap-de
Copy link

Even though we initiated this idea we would like to bring a use case for multiple download URLs to the table: especially for bigger files, it could be useful to offer multiple sources where they could be found, to increase the availablity or for load balancing.

Another solution could be, to specify that the Checksum is always for the downloadURL (if given), never for the accessURL.

@bertvannuffelen
Copy link
Contributor

@init-dcat-ap-de how do we proceed with this request? Do we retract the extra range restrictions and replace it with the latest request?

@bertvannuffelen
Copy link
Contributor

resolution: maintain the original cardinality request as it more naturally fits the semantics of a Distribution.

@bertvannuffelen bertvannuffelen moved this from resolution proposed to releaseTagged in dcat-ap release 2.0 Nov 15, 2019
@bertvannuffelen bertvannuffelen moved this from releaseTagged to closed in dcat-ap release 2.0 Nov 19, 2019
@bertvannuffelen
Copy link
Contributor

after reconsideration this resolution has been retracted and this topic will be added for future-work

@akuckartz
Copy link

this topic will be added for future-work

Where and when?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
No open projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants