You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At present, the reflector information is published through the topic of /cloud_all_fields_fullframe. Can we change it to be published through the topic of /sick_picoscan/scan_fullframe ? Our company is currently testing this aspect and hopes to support it
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
wangyw123456
changed the title
about thepublication of reflector information
About the publication of the reflector information.
May 31, 2024
Thanks for your feedback. The messages in topic "/sick_picoscan/scan_fullframe" are standard ROS messages of type sensor_msgs::LaserScan. This data format is defined by the ROS in https://docs.ros.org/en/noetic/api/sensor_msgs/html/msg/LaserScan.html. It allows the transmission of ranges and intensities of a single and planar laser scan, but cannot be extended with additional and lidar specific properties such as reflector bits.
We recommend using the more flexible point cloud data format in the topic "cloud_all_fields_fullframe", which includes all scan properties incl. the reflector bit.
At present, the reflector information is published through the topic of /cloud_all_fields_fullframe. Can we change it to be published through the topic of /sick_picoscan/scan_fullframe ? Our company is currently testing this aspect and hopes to support it
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: