You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, it's difficult to debug the krb5_child and ldap_child processes, as they are forked from the sssd_be process.
It would be a good idea for long-term maintenance if we wrote a simulator that could invoke these children directly and pass sample input to the child.
The scope is to implement an ldap_child test program, krb5_child test already exists. Since we don't plan any changes to the ldap_child, I think we can push this one out.
Most of the functionality would be covered by integration tests. Some corner cases might still be nice to be tested with unit tests, but I think this ticket can safely be deferred.
milestone: SSSD Future releases (no date set yet) => SSSD Patches welcome
Thank you for taking time to submit this request for SSSD. Unfortunately this issue was not given priority and the team lacks the capacity to work on it at this time.
Given that we are unable to fulfill this request I am closing the issue as wontfix.
If the issue still persist on recent SSSD you can request re-consideration of this decision by reopening this issue. Please provide additional technical details about its importance to you.
Cloned from Pagure issue: https://pagure.io/SSSD/sssd/issue/1127
Currently, it's difficult to debug the krb5_child and ldap_child processes, as they are forked from the sssd_be process.
It would be a good idea for long-term maintenance if we wrote a simulator that could invoke these children directly and pass sample input to the child.
Comments
Comment from dpal at 2012-01-05 15:56:16
Fields changed
milestone: NEEDS_TRIAGE => SSSD 1.9.0 NEEDS_TRIAGE
Comment from dpal at 2012-01-16 17:00:21
Fields changed
milestone: SSSD 1.9.0 NEEDS_TRIAGE => SSSD Kerberos improvements
Comment from dpal at 2012-02-10 23:43:51
Fields changed
rhbz: => 0
Comment from jhrozek at 2012-06-13 15:59:03
Fields changed
feature_milestone: =>
owner: somebody => jhrozek
patch: 0 => 1
status: new => assigned
Comment from dpal at 2012-08-16 23:35:17
Fields changed
proposed_priority: => Nice to have
Comment from jhrozek at 2012-08-17 11:28:58
Note that I implemented a test program for the krb5_child when I was developing the dircache feature.
It needs extending and there is no ldap_child test program.
Comment from dpal at 2012-09-04 23:20:31
Moving all the features planned for 1.10 release into 1.10 beta.
milestone: SSSD Kerberos Improvements Feature => SSSD 1.10 beta
Comment from dpal at 2012-09-04 23:50:13
Fields changed
priority: major => minor
Comment from dpal at 2012-12-20 23:33:42
Fields changed
selected: => Not need
Comment from dpal at 2013-01-02 15:32:08
Moving tickets that are not a priority for SSSD 1.10 into the next release.
milestone: SSSD 1.10 beta => SSSD 1.11 beta
Comment from dpal at 2013-07-30 12:16:54
Fields changed
changelog: =>
design: =>
design_review: => 0
fedora_test_page: =>
milestone: SSSD 1.13 beta => Interim Bucket
priority: minor => major
review: => 0
Comment from dpal at 2013-07-30 12:54:43
Fields changed
milestone: Interim Bucket => SSSD 1.12 beta
Comment from jhrozek at 2014-05-28 15:23:20
The scope is to implement an ldap_child test program, krb5_child test already exists. Since we don't plan any changes to the ldap_child, I think we can push this one out.
review: 0 => 1
Comment from jhrozek at 2014-05-30 16:01:01
Fields changed
milestone: SSSD 1.12 beta => SSSD 1.14 beta
Comment from jhrozek at 2016-02-16 14:05:25
We ended up implementing full integration tests which serve a very similar purpose, albeit less programmable maybe.
mark: => 0
milestone: SSSD 1.14 beta => SSSD 1.15 beta
sensitive: => 0
Comment from jhrozek at 2016-11-25 10:28:50
Since we have integration tests, I think it's fine to defer this one.
selected: Not need => May
Comment from jhrozek at 2016-12-05 15:40:10
Most of the functionality would be covered by integration tests. Some corner cases might still be nice to be tested with unit tests, but I think this ticket can safely be deferred.
milestone: SSSD Future releases (no date set yet) => SSSD Patches welcome
Comment from sgallagh at 2017-02-24 14:30:10
Metadata Update from @sgallagh:
Comment from jhrozek at 2019-08-28 15:40:53
Metadata Update from @jhrozek:
Comment from pbrezina at 2020-03-24 14:21:44
Thank you for taking time to submit this request for SSSD. Unfortunately this issue was not given priority and the team lacks the capacity to work on it at this time.
Given that we are unable to fulfill this request I am closing the issue as wontfix.
If the issue still persist on recent SSSD you can request re-consideration of this decision by reopening this issue. Please provide additional technical details about its importance to you.
Thank you for understanding.
Comment from pbrezina at 2020-03-24 14:21:45
Metadata Update from @pbrezina:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: