Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SSSD will need to be able to provide a prompter callback to libkrb5 #2232

Closed
sssd-bot opened this issue May 2, 2020 · 0 comments
Closed
Assignees

Comments

@sssd-bot
Copy link

sssd-bot commented May 2, 2020

Cloned from Pagure issue: https://pagure.io/SSSD/sssd/issue/1190

  • Created at 2012-02-09 23:43:56 by nalin
  • Closed as Invalid
  • Assigned to sbose

The way PKINIT plugins currently work (see ticket #546, which asks that that be supported), the plugin will attempt to use the prompter callback, which the calling application will have supplied, to ask for information such as smart card PINs and the passphrase for encrypted key storage. Right now the krb5 provider doesn't appear to supply a callback, and it will need to in order to support this case. I'm adding this here to allow it to be tracked as a separable item.

Comments


Comment from dpal at 2012-02-15 15:36:55

Fields changed

milestone: NEEDS_TRIAGE => SSSD Kerberos Improvements Feature


Comment from dpal at 2012-02-15 15:37:24

Fields changed

rhbz: => 0


Comment from dpal at 2012-08-16 23:34:42

This has a tight relation to the work Nathaniel is doing for client side of the AuthHub project. Once the AuthHub client code merged to MIT tree and the new responder interface is implemented we would need utilize this interface in SSSD for OTP and CS authentication.

proposed_priority: => Core
type: enhancement => task


Comment from dpal at 2012-09-04 23:20:16

Moving all the features planned for 1.10 release into 1.10 beta.

milestone: SSSD Kerberos Improvements Feature => SSSD 1.10 beta


Comment from dpal at 2012-09-04 23:46:02

Fields changed

priority: major => critical


Comment from dpal at 2012-12-20 21:51:47

Fields changed

design: =>
design_review: => 0
fedora_test_page: =>
selected: => Not need


Comment from dpal at 2013-01-02 15:32:08

Moving tickets that are not a priority for SSSD 1.10 into the next release.

milestone: SSSD 1.10 beta => SSSD 1.11 beta


Comment from dpal at 2013-07-30 10:18:03

Related to SC and OTP work.

changelog: =>
milestone: SSSD 1.12 beta => Interim Bucket
priority: critical => major
review: => 0


Comment from dpal at 2013-07-30 12:54:43

Fields changed

milestone: Interim Bucket => SSSD 1.12 beta


Comment from jhrozek at 2014-05-28 15:29:13

Should be solved together with ticket #2335 which is in 1.12 in at the moment.


Comment from jhrozek at 2014-05-30 15:54:20

Fields changed

milestone: SSSD 1.12 beta => SSSD 1.12.1


Comment from jhrozek at 2014-09-08 20:08:48

Mass-moving all tickets that didn't make 1.12.1 into 1.12.2

milestone: SSSD 1.12.1 => SSSD 1.12.2


Comment from jhrozek at 2014-09-30 19:06:16

We need to do a release as requested by downstream. Moving tickets that are not fixed already or very close to acking to 1.12.3

milestone: SSSD 1.12.2 => SSSD 1.12.3


Comment from jhrozek at 2014-11-19 18:07:02

We discussed some time ago that in 1.12 we only remove the OTP password from the PAM stack. This ticket belongs to 1.13.

mark: => 0
milestone: SSSD 1.12.3 => SSSD 1.13 beta


Comment from jhrozek at 2015-02-10 16:20:48

Let's evaluate whether we need this during Sumit's smart card work.

owner: somebody => sbose


Comment from jhrozek at 2015-06-25 15:33:15

Sumit will work on pkinit after smartcards are done.

milestone: SSSD 1.13 beta => SSSD 1.13 backlog
sensitive: => 0


Comment from jhrozek at 2016-02-18 16:55:29

OTP was implemented already including prompting, this ticket can be closed.

resolution: => invalid
status: new => closed


Comment from nalin at 2017-02-24 14:49:07

Metadata Update from @nalin:

  • Issue assigned to sbose
  • Issue set to the milestone: SSSD 1.13 backlog
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants