Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Convert all read and write loops to use atomic I/O function #2251

Closed
sssd-bot opened this issue May 2, 2020 · 0 comments
Closed

Convert all read and write loops to use atomic I/O function #2251

sssd-bot opened this issue May 2, 2020 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
Closed: Fixed Issue was closed as fixed.

Comments

@sssd-bot
Copy link

sssd-bot commented May 2, 2020

Cloned from Pagure issue: https://pagure.io/SSSD/sssd/issue/1209

  • Created at 2012-02-27 10:37:59 by jcholast
  • Closed as Fixed
  • Assigned to jhrozek

In commit 915b7f4 an atomic I/O function was introduced. Convert all of our read and write loops to use this function.

Comments


Comment from sgallagh at 2012-03-01 15:45:02

Fields changed

rhbz: => 0


Comment from sgallagh at 2012-03-01 15:45:40

Fields changed

milestone: NEEDS_TRIAGE => SSSD 1.9 beta
owner: somebody => jcholast


Comment from jhrozek at 2012-04-02 15:32:17

Honza is busy with other tasks, picking up.

owner: jcholast => jhrozek
status: new => assigned


Comment from jhrozek at 2012-04-16 10:22:25

Fields changed

patch: 0 => 1


Comment from jhrozek at 2012-04-20 17:16:07

Fixed in master:
- e3c99ae
- 9959c51
- 9d7d445

resolution: => fixed
status: assigned => closed


Comment from jcholast at 2017-02-24 14:59:12

Metadata Update from @jcholast:

  • Issue assigned to jhrozek
  • Issue set to the milestone: SSSD 1.9.0 beta 1
@sssd-bot sssd-bot added the Closed: Fixed Issue was closed as fixed. label May 2, 2020
@sssd-bot sssd-bot closed this as completed May 2, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Closed: Fixed Issue was closed as fixed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants