Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RFE] create a generic sssdctl utility #2842

Closed
sssd-bot opened this issue May 2, 2020 · 0 comments
Closed

[RFE] create a generic sssdctl utility #2842

sssd-bot opened this issue May 2, 2020 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
Bugzilla Closed: Fixed Issue was closed as fixed.

Comments

@sssd-bot
Copy link

sssd-bot commented May 2, 2020

Cloned from Pagure issue: https://pagure.io/SSSD/sssd/issue/1800


Currently we have sss_debuglevel that is able to set the debug level of SSSD on runtime. We also have a request (ticket #1788) to extend sss_debuglevel to read the debug level and another request (ticket #385) to read the online or offline status.

Instead of several utilities each for one task, we could have one more integrated utility that would control the sssd state. The name proposed on a meeting was sssdctl.

The current tools like sss_debuglevel would become symlinks to the new tool.

Comments


Comment from jhrozek at 2013-01-31 16:53:08

Fields changed

type: defect => enhancement


Comment from dpal at 2013-01-31 19:39:25

Fields changed

milestone: NEEDS_TRIAGE => SSSD 1.11 beta
summary: RFE: create a generic sssdctl utility => [RFE] create a generic sssdctl utility


Comment from dpal at 2013-01-31 19:40:19

Related #1788


Comment from dpal at 2013-02-19 10:40:13

Fields changed

rhbz: => todo


Comment from dpal at 2013-12-02 20:41:03

Linked to Bugzilla bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879333 (RHEL RFE)

rhbz: todo => [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879333 879333]


Comment from dpal at 2014-03-07 15:47:03

Fields changed

changelog: =>
keywords: => Status
review: => 0


Comment from dpal at 2014-09-26 18:27:44

Fields changed

mark: => 1


Comment from preichl at 2015-01-14 12:05:43

Fields changed

owner: somebody => preichl


Comment from jhrozek at 2015-02-10 15:09:12

This is a superset of #1788, not sure we can implement the whole sssdctl in time, but let's start and see how far we get..


Comment from jhrozek at 2015-05-12 10:32:13

Downstream no longer requires this RFE. Moving to backlog.

milestone: SSSD 1.13 beta => SSSD 1.13 backlog


Comment from jhrozek at 2016-02-11 11:45:23

Fields changed

milestone: SSSD 1.13 backlog => SSSD 1.14 alpha
priority: major => blocker
sensitive: => 0


Comment from jhrozek at 2016-02-22 22:38:37

In Alpha we will only implement the API, the utility will be part of the Beta release.

milestone: SSSD 1.14 alpha => SSSD 1.14 beta


Comment from jhrozek at 2016-04-18 18:56:29

Fields changed

design: => https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/DesignDocs/sssctl


Comment from mkosek at 2016-06-10 14:29:49

Fields changed

owner: preichl => pbrezina


Comment from jhrozek at 2016-06-20 12:13:21

Pavel sent me his branch for review, marking as has-patch.

patch: 0 => 1


Comment from jhrozek at 2016-06-27 18:11:50

Fixed as part of the sssctl patchset:

resolution: => fixed
status: new => closed


Comment from jhrozek at 2017-02-24 14:24:08

Metadata Update from @jhrozek:

  • Issue assigned to pbrezina
  • Issue set to the milestone: SSSD 1.14 beta
@sssd-bot sssd-bot added Bugzilla Closed: Fixed Issue was closed as fixed. labels May 2, 2020
@sssd-bot sssd-bot closed this as completed May 2, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bugzilla Closed: Fixed Issue was closed as fixed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants