Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Find a happy system for reweighting #10

Open
SamStudio8 opened this issue Feb 6, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Find a happy system for reweighting #10

SamStudio8 opened this issue Feb 6, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@SamStudio8
Copy link
Owner

SamStudio8 commented Feb 6, 2017

Currently, reweighting works pretty well, apart from cases like this:
screenshot from 2017-02-06 12-47-45

We end up "spending" the observed GA's on the first few rounds of path finding. Leaving us only able to select the unweighted GG option in future paths. This is technically correct, but we need a method that perhaps uses more delicate reweighting?

@SamStudio8
Copy link
Owner Author

screenshot from 2017-02-06 13-12-43

etc.

@SamStudio8
Copy link
Owner Author

SamStudio8 commented Feb 6, 2017

In a quick and dirty fashion, we can cap the ratio used to reweight the Hansel matrix and this yields more accurate results (on the order of 0.2-2%). This somewhat confirms the hypothesis that aggressive reweighting is likely to be the cause of the close-but-no-cigar results on some of our datasets.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant