Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

For upstream bug verification process we need default_organization with data #1549

Closed
sthirugn opened this issue Oct 10, 2014 · 5 comments
Closed

Comments

@sthirugn
Copy link
Contributor

After upstream installation, automation should update (Default_Organization?)

  1. import manifest
  2. enable rhel6 or rhel7 repos
  3. sync content
    This would save a lot of time since this bug process is happening once a week now.
@elyezer
Copy link
Contributor

elyezer commented Oct 13, 2014

A automation-tools task will make this easy to accomplish. I have created an issue there.

I can do this but will more detailed information for the steps because I have not synced stuff yet.

@sthirugn sthirugn changed the title For upstream bug verification process we need default_corporation with data For upstream bug verification process we need default_organization with data Oct 15, 2014
@kbidarkar
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like we require the robottelo code here TODO this task.
I feel the easiest would be to use robottelo/api

EDIT: ah! ok. automation-tools task. So we can use cli to do this. I mean use fabric to run cli commands directly on the server.

@elyezer
Copy link
Contributor

elyezer commented Apr 9, 2015

@cswiii have crafted a great list of suggested data to be populated for upgrade tests here #1622 (comment). The proposed data can be a guide for this.

@rochacbruno
Copy link
Contributor

@sthirugn @kbidarkar still an issue or we can close?

@sthirugn
Copy link
Contributor Author

satellite-populate can be used to do this now. Lets close this and open a new issue, if this is needed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants