Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Existing studies on SciGraph annotator accuracy and speed #297

Open
gaurav opened this issue Nov 15, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Existing studies on SciGraph annotator accuracy and speed #297

gaurav opened this issue Nov 15, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@gaurav
Copy link
Contributor

gaurav commented Nov 15, 2021

Hi there! My colleagues and I are comparing several approaches to named-entity recognition (NER), including SciGraph's Annotator feature (via the Monarch API). Has anybody already run SciGraph's Annotator on an existing NER corpus, such as the BioCreative V CDR task corpus, to compare its accuracy and speed with other NER tools? Is there a SciGraph paper whose citations I can look at for such work? Thanks so much!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant