You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I defined a simple ODE and attempted to tune parameters and initial conditions to match simulated observations. However, I got a "No matching function wrapper was found!" error.
I tried to use SciMLBase.unwrapped_f by changing ODEProblem(ode_f, [x0, v0], tspan, p) to ODEProblem(SciMLBase.unwrapped_f(ode_f), [x0, v0], tspan, p), but this did not change the error.
The full error message is very long because of large types. I had to abridge it to stay within Github's post length limits
I expect that would work, and perhaps it could be folded into the prepare_function function or a similar extensible API that can work for all problem types.
But I really have no idea what the error is or where it's coming from, and it's quite possible there is a more robust/extensible/appropriate solution (e.g. defining the appropriate function wrapper)
I expect that would work, and perhaps it could be folded into the prepare_function function or a similar extensible API that can work for all problem types.
Yes
I defined a simple ODE and attempted to tune parameters and initial conditions to match simulated observations. However, I got a "No matching function wrapper was found!" error.
I tried to use
SciMLBase.unwrapped_f
by changingODEProblem(ode_f, [x0, v0], tspan, p)
toODEProblem(SciMLBase.unwrapped_f(ode_f), [x0, v0], tspan, p)
, but this did not change the error.The full error message is very long because of large types. I had to abridge it to stay within Github's post length limits
@ChrisRackauckas, do you know what may be causing this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: