Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deal with special dash paths in fuse operations #904

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jan 6, 2020
Merged

Conversation

vxgmichel
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@sentry-io
Copy link

sentry-io bot commented Jan 3, 2020

Sentry issue: PARSEC-J68

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 6, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #904 into master will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #904      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.99%   81.01%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         261      261              
  Lines       21337    21337              
==========================================
+ Hits        17282    17287       +5     
+ Misses       4055     4050       -5
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
parsec/core/mountpoint/fuse_operations.py 39.47% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
parsec/core/fs/userfs/userfs.py 84.33% <0%> (-0.22%) ⬇️
parsec/core/fs/workspacefs/entry_transactions.py 97.71% <0%> (+0.57%) ⬆️
parsec/backend/postgresql/block.py 90.14% <0%> (+1.4%) ⬆️
parsec/monitoring.py 62.85% <0%> (+11.42%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update fcfd802...057df54. Read the comment docs.

@vxgmichel vxgmichel merged commit c364d16 into master Jan 6, 2020
@vxgmichel vxgmichel deleted the dash-path-in-fuse branch January 6, 2020 14:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants