New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gpg: no gpg-agent running this session #2599
Comments
Same issue here. I've reverted back to 2.3.1 and held gpg update as a temporary workaround. |
Was having the same issue and managed to fix it by manually creating the directory There may be a better solution for actually fixing the manifest, but I decided to try this after doing a bit of research and noticing that the output from |
For some reason, gpg is refusing to respect the https://dev.gnupg.org/T5537 is a suspicious changed introduced with 2.3.2, but I'll need to investigate further. It's not yet clear if this is a bug with gpg or the manifest just needs to be changed to comply with a recent change. |
The reason 2.3.1 socket dir used 2.3.2 had a change to the socket dir behaviour on Windows. As seen here, it now uses the Whether it's intended behaviour or not, I think simply making a directory named |
changing persist to |
any news? |
and how to install old version ?
for install lts, but I got
|
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
Any news? |
I don't know why, but gpg@2.3.1 works. Try |
Doesn't work for me ;( C:\Users\clumbo>scoop install gpg@2.3.1 |
You could try installing the old version like this:
Seems to work fine on my end. |
After updating gpg to 2.3.2, when I try to use gpg, I get an error saying that gpg-agent is not running.
The commands and errors I tried are as follows
When we tried installing the same version of gpg without scoop, the command worked fine, so there seems to be a problem with the installation method using scoop.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: