Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Request]: garnet #5717

Closed
7 tasks done
Capella87 opened this issue Apr 16, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #5718
Closed
7 tasks done

[Request]: garnet #5717

Capella87 opened this issue Apr 16, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #5718
Labels
package-request requesting new package

Comments

@Capella87
Copy link
Contributor

Capella87 commented Apr 16, 2024

Prerequisites

  • I have searched all issues/PRs to ensure it has not already been reported or fixed.

Criteria

  • Non-GUI tool
  • Reasonably well-known and widely used (e.g. if it's a GitHub project, it should have at least 500 stars and/or 150 forks)
  • English interface (or at least English documentation)
  • Latest stable version
  • Full version (i.e. not a trial version)
  • Fairly standard install (e.g. uses a version-specific download URL, no elaborate pre/post install scripts)

Name

garnet

Description

A high-performance cache-store from Microsoft Research, which implements RESP protocol, so it is compatible with unmodified Redis clients.
It can be a good alternative to Redis for several reasons, faster performance and MIT license.
This manifest is for its standalone version of Garnet.

Homepage

https://microsoft.github.io/garnet

Download Link(s)

https://github.com/microsoft/garnet/releases/

Some Indication of Popularity/Repute

As of May 3, 2024, The package project has
9276 stars and 425 forks.

@Capella87 Capella87 added the package-request requesting new package label Apr 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
package-request requesting new package
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant