Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Form Validation] Identifiers matching multiple inputs should only validate on all valid #2688

Open
fpayer opened this issue Jul 21, 2015 · 9 comments

Comments

@fpayer
Copy link

fpayer commented Jul 21, 2015

From the JSFiddle posted in #2683, if the first field in the array is valid, the entire form is marked valid regardless of the other fields.

http://jsfiddle.net/92p8fkbb/

Entering the the sequence: [1, a, a] will have the form marked as valid.

@jlukic jlukic changed the title [Form Validation] Bug with validating array of fields [Form Validation] Identifiers matching multiple inputs should only validate on all valid Jul 21, 2015
@jlukic
Copy link
Member

jlukic commented Jul 21, 2015

The current form supports 1 identifier 1 set of rules. 1 to many is not supported, but I can see this as an addition.

@jlukic jlukic added this to the 2.x Changes milestone Jul 21, 2015
@federicotarantino
Copy link

A simil bug is for multiple dropdown.
For example, if I add an "email" validation on multiple dropdown (with allowAdditions), check is not for each email, but for all email as single string.

@shivekundefined
Copy link

Is this fixed in latest version of Semantic UI?

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Feb 24, 2018

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 30 days if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Feb 24, 2018
@fpayer
Copy link
Author

fpayer commented Feb 24, 2018

Bug still exists

@stale stale bot removed the stale label Feb 24, 2018
@goonursultan
Copy link

Зайбал жауап берсендерш щщщс

@lubber-de

This comment was marked as spam.

@snowshine09
Copy link

It seems the shorthand version could not be used in conjunction with the full version for validation rules. It would be more reasonable to be flexible in these forms.

@lubber-de

This comment was marked as spam.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants