Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

output problem #25

Closed
Phoenix1112 opened this issue Nov 8, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

output problem #25

Phoenix1112 opened this issue Nov 8, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@Phoenix1112
Copy link

I save the results of the program as -o results.txt. but if there is no parameter in a url address, it writes the same url address without parameters to the output file. I don't understand why you set it this way. If no parameter is found, it doesn't make much sense to add it to the output file. If you examine both this problem and the other issue(https://github.com/Sh1Yo/x8/issues/24) I created and update the program, the program will be much better.

@Sh1Yo
Copy link
Owner

Sh1Yo commented Nov 9, 2022

I made it this way to clarify whether the specific url was checked. You can easily remove it from the list later by using a bit of coding or grep. Feel free to reopen issue, if you think that there's really a problem in printing output without found parameters.

@Sh1Yo Sh1Yo closed this as completed Nov 9, 2022
@Phoenix1112
Copy link
Author

Phoenix1112 commented Nov 9, 2022

@Sh1Yo I get all the url addresses from the url list and there are also url addresses with parameters in these url addresses. In such a scenario, if she writes a url address with a parameter to the output, I cannot understand which is the new url and which is the old url. because your program will write the parameterized url address to the output with parameters even if it does not find a result.
Therefore, it is useful for your program to print it out only when it finds a new parameter.

@Phoenix1112
Copy link
Author

@Sh1Yo ??

@Sh1Yo
Copy link
Owner

Sh1Yo commented Nov 12, 2022

There's a possibility that this thing will get implemented in the next version, but probably it's easier for you to just change your program's logic. I can't customize my tool to suit everyone's needs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants