Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Simplify and Enhance Code Structure by Refactoring Repetitive Code #2799

Closed

Conversation

AndresCdo
Copy link
Contributor

@AndresCdo AndresCdo commented Apr 21, 2023

Improve agent_manager.py file.

Background

Redundancy makes the code harder to read, maintain, and modify. To address these issues, a pull request has been submitted that simplifies and refactors the repetitive code using new helper methods, making the code more concise, organized, and easier to manage.

Changes

  • Refactored repetitive code: The pull request introduces new helper methods such as _run_plugins_pre_instruction, _generate_reply, _run_plugins_on_instruction, and _run_plugins_post_instruction to simplify and refactor the repetitive code. These methods are designed to make the code more concise and organized, reducing the redundancy and making the codebase easier to manage.

  • Simplified create_agent and message_agent methods: The pull request uses the newly created helper methods to simplify and enhance the create_agent and message_agent methods. By leveraging the new helper methods, the code in these methods becomes more concise and easier to read, making it easier for other developers to understand and modify the code.

  • Removed unnecessary code: The pull request also removes unnecessary code that is no longer needed after the refactoring process. This makes the codebase more streamlined and easier to maintain, reducing the risk of errors and inconsistencies.

Documentation

Documentation will be added.

Test Plan

CI workflow.

PR Quality Checklist

  • My pull request is atomic and focuses on a single change.
  • I have thoroughly tested my changes with multiple different prompts.
  • I have considered potential risks and mitigations for my changes.
  • I have documented my changes clearly and comprehensively.
  • I have not snuck in any "extra" small tweaks changes

@ntindle ntindle added needs discussion To be discussed among maintainers needs investigation labels Apr 22, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 22, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 59.45% and project coverage change: +1.33 🎉

Comparison is base (4a20616) 41.66% compared to head (5493c6a) 42.99%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2799      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   41.66%   42.99%   +1.33%     
==========================================
  Files          65       65              
  Lines        3029     3021       -8     
  Branches      507      496      -11     
==========================================
+ Hits         1262     1299      +37     
+ Misses       1702     1654      -48     
- Partials       65       68       +3     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
autogpt/config/config.py 74.83% <50.00%> (ø)
autogpt/agent/agent_manager.py 67.21% <60.00%> (+46.92%) ⬆️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@github-actions github-actions bot added size/xl and removed size/l labels Apr 22, 2023
@AndresCdo
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ntindle, the unit test was added, and the checks are ok. However, this PR needs discussion and investigation. @BillSchumacher, take a look at this change.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the conflicts Automatically applied to PRs with merge conflicts label Apr 22, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has conflicts with the base branch, please resolve those so we can evaluate the pull request.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the conflicts Automatically applied to PRs with merge conflicts label Apr 23, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

Conflicts have been resolved! 🎉 A maintainer will review the pull request shortly.

@github-actions
Copy link

This PR exceeds the recommended size of 1000 lines. Please make sure you are NOT addressing multiple issues with one PR. Note this PR might be rejected due to its size.

@github-actions
Copy link

This PR exceeds the recommended size of 200 lines. Please make sure you are NOT addressing multiple issues with one PR. Note this PR might be rejected due to its size

@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview April 29, 2023 18:36 Inactive
@github-actions
Copy link

This PR exceeds the recommended size of 200 lines. Please make sure you are NOT addressing multiple issues with one PR. Note this PR might be rejected due to its size

@p-i-
Copy link
Contributor

p-i- commented May 5, 2023

This is a mass message from the AutoGPT core team.
Our apologies for the ongoing delay in processing PRs.
This is because we are re-architecting the AutoGPT core!

For more details (and for infor on joining our Discord), please refer to:
https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/Auto-GPT/wiki/Architecting

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 5, 2023

This PR exceeds the recommended size of 200 lines. Please make sure you are NOT addressing multiple issues with one PR. Note this PR might be rejected due to its size

@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview May 5, 2023 15:10 Inactive
@AndresCdo AndresCdo requested a review from a team May 8, 2023 10:31
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 8, 2023

This PR exceeds the recommended size of 200 lines. Please make sure you are NOT addressing multiple issues with one PR. Note this PR might be rejected due to its size

@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview May 8, 2023 10:31 Inactive
@github-actions github-actions bot added size/l and removed size/xl labels May 8, 2023
autogpt/agent/agent_manager.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview May 8, 2023 13:34 Inactive
@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview May 12, 2023 16:29 Inactive
@github-actions github-actions bot added the conflicts Automatically applied to PRs with merge conflicts label May 25, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has conflicts with the base branch, please resolve those so we can evaluate the pull request.

@ntindle ntindle self-assigned this Jun 7, 2023
@ntindle
Copy link
Member

ntindle commented Jun 10, 2023

can you get the test coverage up on the changes?

@AndresCdo AndresCdo closed this Aug 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
conflicts Automatically applied to PRs with merge conflicts needs discussion To be discussed among maintainers needs investigation size/l
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants