Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Gathering Shadows (Shadow 2pc) only buffs n-1 ticks of Mind Sear #966

Closed
jaervified opened this issue Oct 12, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Gathering Shadows (Shadow 2pc) only buffs n-1 ticks of Mind Sear #966

jaervified opened this issue Oct 12, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
2-Dragonflight Priest: Shadow Priest

Comments

@jaervified
Copy link

jaervified commented Oct 12, 2022 •
edited by seanpeters86

Game Version:
10.0.2 live Build 47213

Description:
Gathering Shadows (Shadow 2pc) is only buffing n-1 ticks of Mind Sear because the buff drops right as the last tick happens. This means based on the number of ticks you should get, you are getting 1 less buffed ticks worth of damage:

Total Ticks Buffed Ticks
4 3
3 2
2 1

Logs, Images, Videos

Reproducible:

Examples: yes/rarely

Howto:

  1. Get stacks of Gathering Shadows
  2. Channel a Mind Sear
  3. Last tick does less damage than the previous 3
@seanpeters86
Copy link
Contributor

gathering_shadows_bug

still happening on beta

@seanpeters86 seanpeters86 changed the title Gathering Shadows (Shadow 2pc) is only buffing 3 out of 4 ticks of Mind Sear Gathering Shadows (Shadow 2pc) is only buffs n-1 ticks of Mind Sear Jan 3, 2023
@seanpeters86
Copy link
Contributor

still happening on live servers

@seanpeters86 seanpeters86 changed the title Gathering Shadows (Shadow 2pc) is only buffs n-1 ticks of Mind Sear Gathering Shadows (Shadow 2pc) only buffs n-1 ticks of Mind Sear Jan 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
2-Dragonflight Priest: Shadow Priest
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@seanpeters86 @jaervified