Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MVC Support #138

Open
phillip-haydon opened this issue Apr 2, 2014 · 5 comments
Open

MVC Support #138

phillip-haydon opened this issue Apr 2, 2014 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@phillip-haydon
Copy link
Member

First of all we need to rename the assemblies because the naming is retarded.

The output assemblies and namespaces should be identical across all versions of MVC regardless of the target framework.

Having said that, which MVC versions are we going to support?

3, 4, and 5?

At the moment we only officially support 3/4, most people have moved away from 3 so is it worth still trying to support that? Should we only support 4/5?

Those who are on 3, are probably still targeting .NET 3.5, i would assume.

@PureKrome
Copy link
Member

So how do you create one nuget package that supports mvc 3/4/5 or just 4/5?

@phillip-haydon
Copy link
Member Author

Talking about the namespace/assembly name, not the package name.

The Assembly says .MVC3 instead of .MVC

@PureKrome
Copy link
Member

ooooooOOOOOHHhhhhhhhh..

👍 👍

@PureKrome
Copy link
Member

Ok. so the namespace for the assemblies should be

SimpleAuthentication.Mvc ?

And for version 2.0, we should only target v5 IMO.

leave 3/4 support for v1 (when that gets released) ?

@PureKrome PureKrome added this to the 2.0 - .NET 4.5 & Async/Await milestone Jun 8, 2014
@phillip-haydon
Copy link
Member Author

Sure, but we should version the V5 project, just need to make the assembly un-versioned.

@PureKrome PureKrome removed this from the 2.0 - .NET 4.5 & Async/Await milestone Oct 17, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants