Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Compatibility with league/flysystem v3.x #1

Open
vansante opened this issue Jul 19, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Compatibility with league/flysystem v3.x #1

vansante opened this issue Jul 19, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@vansante
Copy link

I tried installing your cache adapter by running composer require slam/flysystem-local-cache-proxy, but it appears it is only compatible with Flysystem v2. The full output is:

# composer require slam/flysystem-local-cache-proxy         
Using version ^0.1.0 for slam/flysystem-local-cache-proxy
./composer.json has been updated
Running composer update slam/flysystem-local-cache-proxy
Loading composer repositories with package information
Updating dependencies
Your requirements could not be resolved to an installable set of packages.

  Problem 1
    - Root composer.json requires slam/flysystem-local-cache-proxy ^0.1.0 -> satisfiable by slam/flysystem-local-cache-proxy[v0.1.0].
    - slam/flysystem-local-cache-proxy v0.1.0 requires league/flysystem ^2.3.2 -> found league/flysystem[2.3.2, ..., 2.4.5] but the package is fixed to 3.1.0 (lock file version) by a partial update and that version does not match. Make sure you list it as an argument for the update command.

Use the option --with-all-dependencies (-W) to allow upgrades, downgrades and removals for packages currently locked to specific versions.
You can also try re-running composer require with an explicit version constraint, e.g. "composer require slam/flysystem-local-cache-proxy:*" to figure out if any version is installable, or "composer require slam/flysystem-local-cache-proxy:^2.1" if you know which you need.

Installation failed, reverting ./composer.json and ./composer.lock to their original content.

Is a v3 compatible version possible?

@Slamdunk
Copy link
Owner

Yes, any pr is welcome

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants