Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Corrosive Eaglefire has incorrect Emission Intensity on Attachment Material #3680

Closed
diddlyono opened this issue Jan 31, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Comments

@diddlyono
Copy link

diddlyono commented Jan 31, 2023

(or vice versa, main body may have incorrect emission intensity, but judging from the pic on the inventory, its the attachment)

i noticed while playing on my steamdeck that the Corrosive Eaglefire skin that my alt equipped was using two different shades of green for the skin. all of the attachments put on the gun were visually brighter than the gun itself. if i had to guess, this is simply that the attachment material has its intensity incorrectly set, or, the skin was brightened in an update but only one material was changed, imo i think the brighter green looks better but thats because i like bright flashy skins :)

Screenshot_122
heres the skin in first person with a zoom in on the scope and base, very clearly contrasting shades

Screenshot_119
once again, but showing it in third person, with a direct comparison between the shades of green

Screenshot_120
and the clearest look, on a rifle rack. notice how this also affects the iron sights, despite not affecting them in the economy icon.

Screenshot_123
once again in first person, however with a direct comparison of the greens

Screenshot_124
and one more, on a rifle rack, where it is very visible that the irons, vertical grip and military magazine are brighter than the gun itself.

i spent £0.14 on this skin to report this lmao

@SDGNelson
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the report! Looks like this affects a variety of skins. Will fix for the next update.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants