We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Why does the filament coming out of the 0.4mm nozzle appear to be 0.45? What is the mathematical formula for this?
All
None
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
https://manual.slic3r.org/advanced/flow-math
Just realized that question not about math itself, but regarding settings handling.
In your case better to express width in percentage: set it 100% to explicitly make it to be deducted from the nozzle size.
Seems like setting it to 0 exposes some bug in configuration.
Sorry, something went wrong.
https://manual.slic3r.org/advanced/flow-math Just realized that question not about math itself, but regarding settings handling. In your case better to express width in percentage: set it 100% to explicitly make it to be deducted from the nozzle size. Seems like setting it to 0 exposes some bug in configuration.
Yes, your determination is correct, when you set the default width to 0, the width is 0.45mm. But when I set it to 100% it shows 0.40mm.
@SoftFever Is this a bug?
0 means automatic or default in this case. When you put a absolute non zero value or percentage, Orca will calculate it accordingly
No branches or pull requests
Is there an existing issue for this feature request?
Is your feature request related to a problem?
Why does the filament coming out of the 0.4mm nozzle appear to be 0.45? What is the mathematical formula for this?
![width](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/33813227/332561188-61e12c39-015c-452a-b36e-d590eaf17bd4.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.uoSs0ySr2JOdS4AtFIASELA-dYW_NgX3ypWaeWgOpYQ)
Which printers will be beneficial to this feature?
All
Describe the solution you'd like
None
Describe alternatives you've considered
No response
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: