Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix the executable lines of code count to ignore attributes #1649

Closed
Evangelink opened this issue Aug 9, 2018 · 0 comments
Closed

Fix the executable lines of code count to ignore attributes #1649

Evangelink opened this issue Aug 9, 2018 · 0 comments
Assignees
@Evangelink
Labels
Type: False Positive Rule IS triggered when it shouldn't be.
Milestone
7.4

Comments

@Evangelink
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Currently doing a concatenation inside of an attribute will result in the count of executable lines of code to be increased. This is a False Positive.

Repro steps

See https://next.sonarqube.com/sonarqube/component_measures?id=sonaranalyzer-csharp-vbnet&metric=coverage&selected=sonaranalyzer-csharp-vbnet%3Asonaranalyzer-csharp-vbnet%3A39CCD086-A7F8-42A0-B402-3C9BD9EB4825%3AProperties%2FAssemblyInfo.cs
@Evangelink Evangelink added Area: Rules Type: False Positive Rule IS triggered when it shouldn't be. labels Aug 9, 2018
@Evangelink Evangelink added this to the 7.4 milestone Aug 9, 2018
@Evangelink Evangelink self-assigned this Aug 9, 2018
@Evangelink Evangelink changed the title Fix the executable lines of code walker with attributes Fix the executable lines of code count to ignore attributes Aug 9, 2018
@Evangelink Evangelink mentioned this issue Aug 9, 2018
Merged
@ghost ghost removed the Status: Needs Review label Aug 9, 2018
@valhristov valhristov mentioned this issue Aug 22, 2018
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@Evangelink Evangelink

Labels
Type: False Positive Rule IS triggered when it shouldn't be.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
7.4
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@Evangelink