You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Need to add a section in the discussion / limitations:
On frame Reporting. Detailed on frames are not reported if the landmarks were obtained through palpation, functional identification, optimization, or by clicking through a mesh interface.
example: if a center of rotation is identified through a Score method, it's a functional method, but it refers to the center of rotation of a joint, so we consider we were looking for the anatomical site.
Reperes segementaires trop exotiques
Sahara et al 2006 : The scapula coordinate system is the clavicle coordinate system at abduction zero degree. The scapua frame is very exotic and not convertable to ISB standards.
Angles articulaires
Certains auteurs proposent des méthodes non standard :
Projection methods : Guttierez
Mettre les autres
Rythme thoracohumeral vs glenohumeral , raison technologique, ou pins no reason.
Charbonnier
Dal Maso
Zhang
Methodes de corrections:
Sulkar et al 2001 huméral ISB distal -> landmarks distaux
Methode de correction manquante qui ISB to glene.
Removed Graichen and Hallstrom
How do we know that our dataset is better than skin markers data? Does the data with offset still better than skin markers data ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Need to add a section in the discussion / limitations:
On frame Reporting. Detailed on frames are not reported if the landmarks were obtained through palpation, functional identification, optimization, or by clicking through a mesh interface.
example: if a center of rotation is identified through a Score method, it's a functional method, but it refers to the center of rotation of a joint, so we consider we were looking for the anatomical site.
Reperes segementaires trop exotiques
Sahara et al 2006 : The scapula coordinate system is the clavicle coordinate system at abduction zero degree. The scapua frame is very exotic and not convertable to ISB standards.
Angles articulaires
Certains auteurs proposent des méthodes non standard :
Projection methods : Guttierez
Mettre les autres
Rythme thoracohumeral vs glenohumeral , raison technologique, ou pins no reason.
Charbonnier
Dal Maso
Zhang
Methodes de corrections:
Sulkar et al 2001 huméral ISB distal -> landmarks distaux
Methode de correction manquante qui ISB to glene.
Removed Graichen and Hallstrom
How do we know that our dataset is better than skin markers data? Does the data with offset still better than skin markers data ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: