Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Liip Theme compatibility #91

Open
nicodmf opened this issue Jun 22, 2014 · 6 comments
Open

Liip Theme compatibility #91

nicodmf opened this issue Jun 22, 2014 · 6 comments

Comments

@nicodmf
Copy link

nicodmf commented Jun 22, 2014

To begin thanks for the projet, this work easily and permit to integrate a real assets management.

Explanation

For many projet, i use LiipTheme, This is very usefull to provide different interface for a same business case. So as spBower provide a simple tag for assetic : libname_(js|css), it is impossible to have a theme with jquery 1.8 and another with jquery 2.0.

Do you see a work-arround or a good solution.

I created an issue in LiipTheme too, maybe you will communicate to merge yours knowledges.

liip/LiipThemeBundle#98

@Spea
Copy link
Owner

Spea commented Jun 30, 2014

I will implement a feature where you can set a prefix for a bundle configuration (or even a specific package), I think this should solve your issue

@nicodmf
Copy link
Author

nicodmf commented Jun 30, 2014

cool, very good idea

@gusdecool
Copy link

cool, i'm agree 💃

@dbu
Copy link

dbu commented Mar 24, 2015

did this ever happen?

@Spea
Copy link
Owner

Spea commented Mar 24, 2015

No, sadly not. I've currently not the time to maintain this bundle as I want, hopefully this will change in the next few weeks. If you still want/need this feature, I would really appreciate it, if you could create a PR for this.

@dbu
Copy link

dbu commented Mar 24, 2015

i was just going through open issues on LiipThemeBundle, checking if we can clean up some of the things. if we end up needing it in the project i currently work on, i will create a PR, sure.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants