Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-enable CodeQL for Javascript #1209

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 21, 2021
Merged

Re-enable CodeQL for Javascript #1209

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 21, 2021

Conversation

jauderho
Copy link
Contributor

Added exception for flattener.js as requested. It turns out that an external config file for CodeQL is needed.

Docs are here https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/secure-coding/automatically-scanning-your-code-for-vulnerabilities-and-errors/configuring-code-scanning

@tlimoncelli tlimoncelli merged commit 997995e into StackExchange:master Jul 21, 2021
tlimoncelli pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2021
* Create codeql-config.yml

* Update codeql-analysis.yml

Add config to exclude certain files
tlimoncelli added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2021
* Add PrivateKey authentication for TransIP

* Remove space before comma

* Re-enable CodeQL for Javascript (#1209)

* Create codeql-config.yml

* Update codeql-analysis.yml

Add config to exclude certain files

* deSEC implement pagination (#1208)

* deSEC: Implement pagination for domain list #1177

* deSEC: add debug logging for pagination

* deSEC: simplify get/post methods by allowing url / api endpoints as target

* deSEC: implement pagination for getRecords function

* deSEC: fix linter warnings

* deSEC: replace domainIndexInitalized variable with checking if the domainIndex == nil

* deSEC: add mutex for domainIndex

Co-authored-by: Tom Limoncelli <tlimoncelli@stackoverflow.com>

Co-authored-by: Vincent Hagen <vinnie@script4web.nl>
Co-authored-by: Jauder Ho <jauderho@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Georg <georg@neuland.tech>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants