You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
I am facing a strange behavior when running supervisorctl status.
Imagine you have at least one process named azertyuiop. I don't have any azertyuiop group and after some test it seems that I can't have a group named like a single process (which is a logical behavior).
When I run supervisorctl azertyuiop azertyuiop:* I get this output:
This strange behavior is really interesting for what I am trying to do as I don't always know if I execute that command for a single process or for a group of processes. This output shows that this information doesn't matter, so I could always run supervisorctl status azertyuiop:* whithout knowing if azertyuiop is a group or a single process.
I would like to know if it was written so or if you might change this in future releases? As I would like to be able to shorten my code thanks to that behavior ^^
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I would like to know if it was written so or if you might change this in future releases? As I would like to be able to shorten my code thanks to that behavior
There are no current plans to change how supervisorctl works. If we do make a breaking change sometime in the future, we will bump the major version and note it in the changelog.
Hi,
I am facing a strange behavior when running
supervisorctl status
.Imagine you have at least one process named
azertyuiop
. I don't have anyazertyuiop
group and after some test it seems that I can't have a group named like a single process (which is a logical behavior).When I run
supervisorctl azertyuiop azertyuiop:*
I get this output:This strange behavior is really interesting for what I am trying to do as I don't always know if I execute that command for a single process or for a group of processes. This output shows that this information doesn't matter, so I could always run
supervisorctl status azertyuiop:*
whithout knowing ifazertyuiop
is a group or a single process.I would like to know if it was written so or if you might change this in future releases? As I would like to be able to shorten my code thanks to that behavior ^^
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: