New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Internal colors names renamed: their old names should still be provided #68
Comments
Typically, I hesitate very much to change a documented feature. But, the color names never were documented (even if used in one example). Since Request 55, I thought about making the names official. To keep the old names and just document them would have been one option. Finally, I droped this idea because the naming should clearly indicate the official nature. If an Still, I also hesitate to change internal macros and names, because every change to do something good may imply some unwanted side effects. In this case, I decided to change the names even if I am forced to change some applications of myself - or you or others. Keeping the old names as deprecated for some time would just shift the time of adaption. For all internal color names, just the Replace This should do the trick. I've done it with several of my own applications. I hope I did not cause too much trouble with this change. This good side is that color names are now official and (hopefully) never change in future. |
I agree but, because these names came up from the deep, usually a secret place of gods, through the |
oh,poor me! |
With version 4.20 of
tcolorbox
, internal colors names:tcbcolframe
,tcbcolback
,tcbcolbacktitle
,tcbcolbacklower
,tcbcolupper
,tcbcollower
,tcbcoltitle
have been renamed.IMHO, their old legacy names (containing an
@
) should still be provided, since some users (for instance me :) used them, getting inspiration from some examples of thetcolorbox
' documentation, e.g. currently the one page 165 that contains\path[fill=tcbcolback!30!black]
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: