Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request for documentation on recomended PCDM structure for best compatibility #116

Closed
Surfrdan opened this issue Jul 13, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #125
Closed

Request for documentation on recomended PCDM structure for best compatibility #116

Surfrdan opened this issue Jul 13, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #125
Labels
3 documentation enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Surfrdan
Copy link

Is it possible for the documentation to provide best practice on how your PCDM models should be structured for best compatibility with the IRIIIF service ?

Alternatively, could a sample of known-good PCDM be shared with the community ?

I suspect PCDM drives the user in a fairly rigid direction but I am aware of certain interpretations which might not match up with the softwares expected input.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 19, 2022

@Surfrdan thank you for submitting this issue. Sorry for the delay in addressing. Documentation and example are both reasonable requests and we will work on supplying theme in either README or Wiki.

@ghost ghost added enhancement New feature or request documentation labels Sep 19, 2022
@ghost ghost self-assigned this Sep 23, 2022
@ghost ghost closed this as completed in #125 Sep 26, 2022
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3 documentation enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant