-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 374
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rewinder - lift 16k state limit #2306
Comments
In the meantime that is about 4.5 minutes of rewind time (at an interval of 1), I think that's plenty for reasonable use cases |
Don't quite know what to make of this statement. From a quick glance at the code it seems like this number is just used as a bitmask for a ringbuffer. Any difficulty or issue in increasing the number of used bits? |
If you increase the hardcoded value, then everyone pays more memory, even though most won't use anywhere near that many states as adelikat points out. |
I see the point, but from what I read the current size is |
Why would anyone ever need a rewinder that big? Since we don't offer random access, you'd have to sit there and rewind for an hour just to get to the earlier states. If you're doing a major project, you need to use actual savestates and we shouldn't try to cram the square peg into the tomato. |
Regardless of the target frame length and buffer size, the rewinder will not store more than 16383 states. A 4GB buffer with 50KB states, both reasonable numbers, would need an 80000 state capacity, so it seems likely we'll go over this. It's not difficult to up this number, I just need some time to think about properly architecting it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: